Articlesshead
'In those days everyone did as he saw fit'
Why capital punishment is never the right thing
A Spring in Our Step?
Freedom from religion or freedom for religion?
Chancellor must act on tax avoidance, say Churches
A ‘pick and mix’ Jesus?
What is a Christian?
The science delusion has made God redundant
‘Davos means money’
The gods of the fame culture
A View from the Sidelines
The extraordinary in the ordinary
Network Ipswich > Opinion > The power of our discreet God
Opinions

The power of our discreet God

JamesI had a few thoughts about why God often seems absent and seems happy to remain hidden backstage. Here's what I concluded. In Matthew 6 Jesus says something which gives an indication of why God’s presence is not immediately made obvious – He sets a pattern for us to follow, and that pattern is that we are to do nothing to draw attention to our good deeds, lest we become proud and take our focus off the intrinsic goodness itself. In Matthew’s gospel, Jesus says “Take care not to perform righteous deeds in order that people may see them; otherwise, you will have no recompense from your heavenly Father.” He follows this by saying “When you give alms, do not blow a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets to win the praise of others.”

And further we are told that God who sees in secret will reward us for our own secrecy and humility. This stretches to prayers too – “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full.” – the message is all about a virtue found in suppressing the ego and not soliciting credit. And the reason seems to be because those who act in accordance with personal solicitations diminish the value of an act that is supposed to be purely and wholesomely Christ-like.

I used to ponder the absent God and wonder why on earth a God who is supposed to love and care for us so much, and moreover one that supposedly desires a relationship with us, keeps doing everything on the quiet. But then one day a series of observations led me to what I believe to be the right answer. I was sitting outside a coffee shop with a friend, and a man holding a charity box was standing over on the far side of the road. As I observed the different ways that people put their money in the box, I could see that some made a big show of their giving and others did it very discreetly. I know full well that we often face an inner conflict when it comes to good deeds – generosity and kindness can seem frustrating if we never get to tell others what we’ve done.

But the more we find ourselves giving discreetly the more we seem to want to give, and the more frequently we seem to want to do it – somehow the act seems to become a pure gesture between oneself and God. We find that the more this occurs the more we crave it, because in the midst of a world that moves us along with its busyness and its tumult those moments when we find discretion (in prayer or in giving or in kindness) are soon becoming the times we find ourselves closest to God.

camoflageIf I give two hundred pounds to a charity and tell everyone about it I am soliciting the approval of men, but if I give that two hundred pounds discreetly it then becomes a point of closeness between God and myself - I act purely, and in doing so I get a big sense of why God bestows gifts in the same way. To know that God is continually bestowing blessings on our lives while we as a human race continue to neglect to thank Him, and in some cases never even acknowledge it is Him, that says so much more to me about how praiseworthy He is than if He continually acted in dramatic ways, demanding attention every five minutes.

We may say that just as He is discreet in allowing His love to pour on us, so too He is discreet in being seemingly absent in the midst of natural disasters, and that is true. He is discreet in both – but in being discreet He is bestowing on us the gift of causality and responsibility in not being slaves to His whim, but as creatures who are genuinely able to love and care and praise and hope freely. We should not be surprised that this is His nature – after all, the same God who made the entire cosmos made Himself small enough and humble enough and discreet enough to be incarnated in a carpenter’s body in a remote part of the world. Until He was thirty years old He worked in ordinary ways under ordinary backwater conditions, while all the time indwelling the discretion of God. And after His baptism when the Father sent the Holy Spirit He took the power of God all the way to the cross and died for us in the face of ridicule and mockery.

And I think it is only when people really get to grips with the nature of our suffering and dying God that they begin to know why He is discreet. He wants to give to us in the same way that He wants us to give to others – with pure and wholesome love, not initially for the attention or benefit of others (although that can come as a result when we put our relationship into practical use for goodness). That is why one’s communion with the Holy Spirit can only be a personal event – and I think the thief on the cross looked across at the tortured Christ next to him and saw that despite His being without sin He still took His place there for us to pay a price that we couldn’t pay. As the thief saw those things he saw something in a few moments that it takes many a lifetime to see - God's discretion is part of His love and His grace and His power to save.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The views carried here are those of the author, not of Network Ipswich, and are intended to stimulate constructive debate between website users. We welcome your thoughts and comments, posted below, upon the ideas expressed here. You can also contact the author direct at james.knight@norfolk.gov.uk . Meanwhile, if you want to find out more about Christianity, visit: www.rejesus.co.uk

James is a Norwich local government officer, author and Proclaimers church member in Norwich. 

Feedback:
Terence Cooper15/12/2010 14:19
If we visualise God anthropomorphically, made in our image, then we might well ponder about the apparent absence of God. If we regard God as a presence in all things, and not capable of being described, then we may not look for an intervening entity in the world.
James Knight (Guest)22/12/2010 22:27
Thanks for the response Terence. I think we must confront our own presuppositions – because the majority of the world’s population remain convinced that the answer is one of two possibilities – a) God does exist, or b) God does not exist. Of course we can discuss God’s existence in simple human-human terms, but while realising that most models we work with are human constructs, and most are comfortable with this once they start to consider the issue carefully. But most do not take it far enough, because they fail to turn ‘existence’ back on itself and assess whether to even think in terms of existence and non-existence is valid.

Given the scarcity of certainty in the world we work with values and aspirations, attempting as a human race to gravitate towards better things. People are quick to talk about rational and irrational faith without really understanding what they’re saying. If an outcome has a clear and predictable pathway then faith is irrational by being superfluous. If an outcome has an intractable and unpredictable pathway then faith can take on the momentum of trust. In science not every hypothesis is right, but just like jurisprudence one doesn’t need to trust people so much as trust the system under which those people employ their judgments. In this sense we are always trusting intractable and unpredictable pathways because much of our world isn’t predictable, nor are outcomes. The realisation heightens when we remember that faith in God is moot without the mobilisation of a whole host of human resources and subjective components with which we work. What I assess is not the abstraction of God to which I have no continual access, but the human subjective assessments of God. I am assessing the rational implications of humanity’s efforts to understand God. Rationality tells me that following Christ’s teachings would show that His blueprint is the correct one, and when I apply those teachings to my individual life and my relationship with others I find them to be powerfully reliable.


Terence Cooper (Guest)23/12/2010 11:10
Thanks for your response, James.

I agree entirely that the key in our faith is the following of the teachings of Jesus.

I am less happy with your statement that not every scientific hypothesis is right. It implies that some are. I would take it as axiomaitc that no hypothesis is "right" in an abolute sense. It can only be adequate in the circumstances until shown to be otherwise. In the meantime we can, rationally, put our faith in it.

I see faith in a similar way: we create or take an hyposthesis and live by it. There may come a time when an individual decides that part. or all, of the hypothesis no longer holds for them and they change it. Contrast that with the need of some churches to declare their truth to be absolute.

Happy Christmas - whether we accept the historicity of the stories that have been built up around the nativity, it is nevertheless the time to celebrate the coming of Jesus the greatest iconoclast of all time(in my humble view).
James Knight (Guest)01/01/2011 13:08
Happy New Year Terence - and everyone at Network Ipswich.

just a comment on this..

"I am less happy with your statement that not every scientific hypothesis is right. It implies that some are. I would take it as axiomaitc that no hypothesis is "right" in an absolute sense. It can only be adequate in the circumstances until shown to be otherwise. In the meantime we can, rationally, put our faith in it."

Sure, but just to confirm my position, I didn't say science deals with absolutes - I believe that Christ is the only Absolute Truth with which we interface. All the rest is just human relativism and subjectivism and humanly constructed 'objectivism' that fits in with the human paradigm.